Sunday, October 12, 2008

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

Richard Cornforth says file a Rico case? OK. But how many such cases
has he won? I know Richard very well as a personal friend but still,
how many Rico cases has he ever won or even taught anyone else how to
win? None! That's how many. Bud Hibbs says take the judgment to a good
consumer advocate? Where will you find one of those?
I'm not telling you that you can file a federal case and win. You
might if you have at least one valid cause of action that you can
prove. You are not going to get the judgment overturned in local court
and you aren't going to get a federal court to overturn it either. All
I'm trying to do is see if we can find a viable cause of action and
until that can be done you should not be worried about going to court.
There will be time for that if and when we come up with some good
causes of action that are still within the statute of limitations.
So let's quit worrying about Richard, Bud or any lawyers. If you don't
have a cause of action you aren't going to go anywhere.


On Oct 12, 10:41 pm, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Notary was colleen McConnel whos commissioned expired Oct 11, 2008 which my case was heard in 2006.(Its not hard to become a notary though)  They had no idea I was going to dig up the number and call.  I used a calling card, pay phone and asked for Pam Davis they sent me to her office and gave me an extension.  Yet I have to admit I never talked to her personally as what was I going to say?  The company was Citicorp Credit Servicss Inc.  I called the state liscensing place, they had info.  How I got the number to call them actually, and newspaper web site with stories about them.  The better business place.  I did as much digging as I could come up with in my mind and had no luck at proving anything fraudulant.  Then check out the website of the lawyers, they make quite a big claim as a debt collector law firm the name was Spotts and Fain from Richmond virginia.  Yet I still think something is a miss as Citibank got a judgement and charged off the
>  acoount, then Spotts and Fain passed the torch to another law firm next to Washington DC..... They claim Citibank hired them.  Somewhere I read that if you called the credit card company that after they charged off a debt they would say you owe them zero dollars.  They did not tell me that when I called very recently (September I believe)  I am not trying to challenge your word with these emails just trying to find out how to Prove with hard evidence what you are saying before I go back to court.  Another point is that you say you can win if Federal Court but if you bring a frivolous case to federal court you go to jail.  The State court saw it as frivolous.  I tried looking up these type of court cases in Federal court which is in Downtown Norfolk and have found NOTHING published...... from the state of Virginia location....  Sorry once bitten twice shy in this court business....  Richard Cornforth says you have to bring a Rico Case against them.  Bud
>  Hibbs says go to a Consumer Lawyer with the judgement  I am not sure at theis point what to do.  
>
> --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> > To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 8:00 PM
> > Pam Davis, eh? Well who was the notary then? Who notarized
> > that
> > affidavit? So what name did they answer the phone by when
> > you called
> > them? Who is this supposed subsidiary of the CC company?
>
> > So the judge don't like Pro  Se litigants, eh? Well
> > nothing unusual
> > about that. It is very difficult for pro se litigants to
> > win in local
> > court but pretty easy for them to win in federal court.
>
> > On Oct 12, 5:36 pm, Lisa Angle
> > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies
> > of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now
> > really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for
> > subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly
> > where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections
> > stating  the copies were from CC company and she was
> > notorizing it to that fact.  The notary stamp was from
> > Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research
> > called the company she worked for and found that she was
> > there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company....
> >  The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector
> > etc etc etc.  It is on all correspondance.  They did send
> > the first letter and I did ask for verification and they
> > sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court.
> >  When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a
> > General District court quoting case study and you cannot
> > when at that level on case study.  They only had an oral
> > >  contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but
> > the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in
> > jail...  He did not like pro se litigation and definately
> > has a relationship with the attornies that go in there..
> >  You truly do not get a fair trial in this state....  Bud
> > Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work
> > for the naca I think.....  Claim they are familiar with the
> > FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for
> > why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a
> > retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with
> > stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.  
>
> > > --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench
> > <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt
> > Collection Discovery Requests
> > > > To: "Creditwrench"
> > <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > > > The affidavit should be more than enough to get
> > the job done
> > > > if it
> > > > contains any false and misleading information
> > which most of
> > > > them do.
> > > > The first thing to look at in analyzing
> > affidavits is to
> > > > look at the
> > > > notary and the seal to see what state the notary
> > is located
> > > > in. If the
> > > > notary is not from your home state then it was
> > probably
> > > > generated by
> > > > the debt collector. So who is the notary in your
> > case, what
> > > > state is
> > > > the notary from and who is the affiant? So they
> > never sent
> > > > you any
> > > > letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on
> > you, eh? That
> > > > may be
> > > > another violation if they did not have the full
> > miranda
> > > > warning on the
> > > > complaint. If the full miranda was not on the
> > complaint
> > > > anywhere did
> > > > they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of
> > the
> > > > service of the
> > > > summons upon you? If not then you have another
> > violation.
> > > > There are
> > > > many more ways to get violations.
>
> > > > You guess you need to find a consumer attorney?
> > Where are
> > > > you going to
> > > > find a good one that knows what he is doing?
> > There
> > > > aren't many of
> > > > those out there so if you want to get the job
> > done you have
> > > > to learn
> > > > how to do it yourself and that is what I teach.
> > And why do
> > > > you want to
> > > > waste time going to the law library to look up
> > the FDCPA
> > > > when it is
> > > > readily available on the web?
>
> > > > On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> > > > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > ok well these attorney's never called me
> > not even
> > > > once only sent letters.  They brought a witness
> > to court
> > > > and an affidavit so they never testified as
> > attornies are
> > > > not allowed to testify in a court for the cc
> > company.  No I
> > > > cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> > > > circumstances but I guess next step is to try a
> > consumer
> > > > attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I
> > will try to
> > > > go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see
> > if I can
> > > > find anything.....    
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

Notary was colleen McConnel whos commissioned expired Oct 11, 2008 which my case was heard in 2006.(Its not hard to become a notary though) They had no idea I was going to dig up the number and call. I used a calling card, pay phone and asked for Pam Davis they sent me to her office and gave me an extension. Yet I have to admit I never talked to her personally as what was I going to say? The company was Citicorp Credit Servicss Inc. I called the state liscensing place, they had info. How I got the number to call them actually, and newspaper web site with stories about them. The better business place. I did as much digging as I could come up with in my mind and had no luck at proving anything fraudulant. Then check out the website of the lawyers, they make quite a big claim as a debt collector law firm the name was Spotts and Fain from Richmond virginia. Yet I still think something is a miss as Citibank got a judgement and charged off the
acoount, then Spotts and Fain passed the torch to another law firm next to Washington DC..... They claim Citibank hired them. Somewhere I read that if you called the credit card company that after they charged off a debt they would say you owe them zero dollars. They did not tell me that when I called very recently (September I believe) I am not trying to challenge your word with these emails just trying to find out how to Prove with hard evidence what you are saying before I go back to court. Another point is that you say you can win if Federal Court but if you bring a frivolous case to federal court you go to jail. The State court saw it as frivolous. I tried looking up these type of court cases in Federal court which is in Downtown Norfolk and have found NOTHING published...... from the state of Virginia location.... Sorry once bitten twice shy in this court business.... Richard Cornforth says you have to bring a Rico Case against them. Bud
Hibbs says go to a Consumer Lawyer with the judgement I am not sure at theis point what to do.


--- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com>
> Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 8:00 PM
> Pam Davis, eh? Well who was the notary then? Who notarized
> that
> affidavit? So what name did they answer the phone by when
> you called
> them? Who is this supposed subsidiary of the CC company?
>
> So the judge don't like Pro Se litigants, eh? Well
> nothing unusual
> about that. It is very difficult for pro se litigants to
> win in local
> court but pretty easy for them to win in federal court.
>
>
>
> On Oct 12, 5:36 pm, Lisa Angle
> <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies
> of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now
> really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for
> subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly
> where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections
> stating  the copies were from CC company and she was
> notorizing it to that fact.  The notary stamp was from
> Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research
> called the company she worked for and found that she was
> there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company....
>  The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector
> etc etc etc.  It is on all correspondance.  They did send
> the first letter and I did ask for verification and they
> sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court.
>  When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a
> General District court quoting case study and you cannot
> when at that level on case study.  They only had an oral
> >  contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but
> the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in
> jail...  He did not like pro se litigation and definately
> has a relationship with the attornies that go in there..
>  You truly do not get a fair trial in this state....  Bud
> Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work
> for the naca I think.....  Claim they are familiar with the
> FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for
> why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a
> retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with
> stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.  
> >
> > --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench
> <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt
> Collection Discovery Requests
> > > To: "Creditwrench"
> <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > > The affidavit should be more than enough to get
> the job done
> > > if it
> > > contains any false and misleading information
> which most of
> > > them do.
> > > The first thing to look at in analyzing
> affidavits is to
> > > look at the
> > > notary and the seal to see what state the notary
> is located
> > > in. If the
> > > notary is not from your home state then it was
> probably
> > > generated by
> > > the debt collector. So who is the notary in your
> case, what
> > > state is
> > > the notary from and who is the affiant? So they
> never sent
> > > you any
> > > letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on
> you, eh? That
> > > may be
> > > another violation if they did not have the full
> miranda
> > > warning on the
> > > complaint. If the full miranda was not on the
> complaint
> > > anywhere did
> > > they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of
> the
> > > service of the
> > > summons upon you? If not then you have another
> violation.
> > > There are
> > > many more ways to get violations.
> >
> > > You guess you need to find a consumer attorney?
> Where are
> > > you going to
> > > find a good one that knows what he is doing?
> There
> > > aren't many of
> > > those out there so if you want to get the job
> done you have
> > > to learn
> > > how to do it yourself and that is what I teach.
> And why do
> > > you want to
> > > waste time going to the law library to look up
> the FDCPA
> > > when it is
> > > readily available on the web?
> >
> > > On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> > > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > ok well these attorney's never called me
> not even
> > > once only sent letters.  They brought a witness
> to court
> > > and an affidavit so they never testified as
> attornies are
> > > not allowed to testify in a court for the cc
> company.  No I
> > > cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> > > circumstances but I guess next step is to try a
> consumer
> > > attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I
> will try to
> > > go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see
> if I can
> > > find anything.....    
> >
> >
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

Pam Davis, eh? Well who was the notary then? Who notarized that
affidavit? So what name did they answer the phone by when you called
them? Who is this supposed subsidiary of the CC company?

So the judge don't like Pro Se litigants, eh? Well nothing unusual
about that. It is very difficult for pro se litigants to win in local
court but pretty easy for them to win in federal court.

On Oct 12, 5:36 pm, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections stating  the copies were from CC company and she was notorizing it to that fact.  The notary stamp was from Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research called the company she worked for and found that she was there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company....  The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector etc etc etc.  It is on all correspondance.  They did send the first letter and I did ask for verification and they sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court.  When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a General District court quoting case study and you cannot when at that level on case study.  They only had an oral
>  contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in jail...  He did not like pro se litigation and definately has a relationship with the attornies that go in there..  You truly do not get a fair trial in this state....  Bud Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work for the naca I think.....  Claim they are familiar with the FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.  
>
> --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> > To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > The affidavit should be more than enough to get the job done
> > if it
> > contains any false and misleading information which most of
> > them do.
> > The first thing to look at in analyzing affidavits is to
> > look at the
> > notary and the seal to see what state the notary is located
> > in. If the
> > notary is not from your home state then it was probably
> > generated by
> > the debt collector. So who is the notary in your case, what
> > state is
> > the notary from and who is the affiant? So they never sent
> > you any
> > letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on you, eh? That
> > may be
> > another violation if they did not have the full miranda
> > warning on the
> > complaint. If the full miranda was not on the complaint
> > anywhere did
> > they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of the
> > service of the
> > summons upon you? If not then you have another violation.
> > There are
> > many more ways to get violations.
>
> > You guess you need to find a consumer attorney? Where are
> > you going to
> > find a good one that knows what he is doing? There
> > aren't many of
> > those out there so if you want to get the job done you have
> > to learn
> > how to do it yourself and that is what I teach. And why do
> > you want to
> > waste time going to the law library to look up the FDCPA
> > when it is
> > readily available on the web?
>
> > On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > ok well these attorney's never called me not even
> > once only sent letters.  They brought a witness to court
> > and an affidavit so they never testified as attornies are
> > not allowed to testify in a court for the cc company.  No I
> > cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> > circumstances but I guess next step is to try a consumer
> > attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I will try to
> > go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see if I can
> > find anything.....    
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections stating the copies were from CC company and she was notorizing it to that fact. The notary stamp was from Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research called the company she worked for and found that she was there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company.... The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector etc etc etc. It is on all correspondance. They did send the first letter and I did ask for verification and they sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court. When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a General District court quoting case study and you cannot when at that level on case study. They only had an oral
contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in jail... He did not like pro se litigation and definately has a relationship with the attornies that go in there.. You truly do not get a fair trial in this state.... Bud Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work for the naca I think..... Claim they are familiar with the FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.


--- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com>
> Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> The affidavit should be more than enough to get the job done
> if it
> contains any false and misleading information which most of
> them do.
> The first thing to look at in analyzing affidavits is to
> look at the
> notary and the seal to see what state the notary is located
> in. If the
> notary is not from your home state then it was probably
> generated by
> the debt collector. So who is the notary in your case, what
> state is
> the notary from and who is the affiant? So they never sent
> you any
> letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on you, eh? That
> may be
> another violation if they did not have the full miranda
> warning on the
> complaint. If the full miranda was not on the complaint
> anywhere did
> they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of the
> service of the
> summons upon you? If not then you have another violation.
> There are
> many more ways to get violations.
>
> You guess you need to find a consumer attorney? Where are
> you going to
> find a good one that knows what he is doing? There
> aren't many of
> those out there so if you want to get the job done you have
> to learn
> how to do it yourself and that is what I teach. And why do
> you want to
> waste time going to the law library to look up the FDCPA
> when it is
> readily available on the web?
>
>
> On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > ok well these attorney's never called me not even
> once only sent letters.  They brought a witness to court
> and an affidavit so they never testified as attornies are
> not allowed to testify in a court for the cc company.  No I
> cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> circumstances but I guess next step is to try a consumer
> attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I will try to
> go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see if I can
> find anything.....    
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

The affidavit should be more than enough to get the job done if it
contains any false and misleading information which most of them do.
The first thing to look at in analyzing affidavits is to look at the
notary and the seal to see what state the notary is located in. If the
notary is not from your home state then it was probably generated by
the debt collector. So who is the notary in your case, what state is
the notary from and who is the affiant? So they never sent you any
letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on you, eh? That may be
another violation if they did not have the full miranda warning on the
complaint. If the full miranda was not on the complaint anywhere did
they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of the service of the
summons upon you? If not then you have another violation. There are
many more ways to get violations.

You guess you need to find a consumer attorney? Where are you going to
find a good one that knows what he is doing? There aren't many of
those out there so if you want to get the job done you have to learn
how to do it yourself and that is what I teach. And why do you want to
waste time going to the law library to look up the FDCPA when it is
readily available on the web?


On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ok well these attorney's never called me not even once only sent letters.  They brought a witness to court and an affidavit so they never testified as attornies are not allowed to testify in a court for the cc company.  No I cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these circumstances but I guess next step is to try a consumer attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I will try to go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see if I can find anything.....    

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

ok well these attorney's never called me not even once only sent letters. They brought a witness to court and an affidavit so they never testified as attornies are not allowed to testify in a court for the cc company. No I cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these circumstances but I guess next step is to try a consumer attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA.... I will try to go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see if I can find anything.....


--- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com>
> Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 9:04 AM
> It makes no difference whether the debt collector attorney
> bought the
> debt or not. None whatever. Attorneys attempting to collect
> a debt are
> 3rd party debt collectors whether they bought the debt or
> not. You
> must learn the law iorder to make FDCPA law work for you.
> It is
> obvious that you have not learned the law, what it says and
> how to
> apply it to the immediate circumstance whatever it might
> be. First
> thing is to have your recording process in place and ready
> to use at a
> moments notice. You also need to have your caller I.D.
> working and
> calls that don't show the name and number of the caller
> should be
> ignored. Don't even pick up the phone. All calls to
> your home phone
> should be call forwarded to your cell phone. That is
> because most cell
> phones will allow you to put a name to each number that
> calls you so
> you will know instantly who is calling you and debt
> collectors will
> only get one chance to call you before you nail them with
> your caller
> I.D. system. Even if they are a huge corporation with many
> different
> phone lines you will soon have them all labeled and know
> instantly who
> they are when they call. That's not so you can evade
> their calls but
> so you can get your recording equipment turned on before
> you pick up
> the phone. You should have a good digital voice recorder
> with you on
> your person at all times just like you should have a decent
> digital
> camera with you at all times in case of vehicle accidents.
> Keep your
> batteries fresh and keep spare batteries for both with you
> at all
> times. The reason is that if the call is from a debt
> collector your
> memory will not recall everything they said or didn't
> say. You will
> need to be able to review the call later so you can analyze
> it for
> every possible violation and get them written down on paper
> and on
> your computer as well. Write the contents of the call
> violations in
> your word processor and then print out a copy and keep it
> in a folder
> for the day you will need it all. My message board at
> http://consumers.creditwrench.com
> has many articles written by attorneys which will teach you
> all you
> need to know about FDCPA and FCRA violations and your
> rights under the
> law. New articles come in every day. So keep up with the
> latest. No,
> the situation is not hopeless. Far from it.
>
>
> On Oct 11, 11:00 am, Lisa Angle
> <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > That would be great but I have not figured out how to
> prove the debt collector attorney bought the debt after they
> have a judgement.  They sued me before the credit card
> company charged off.  Then every lawyer says even if they
> chardged it off the credit card company has a right to sue
> you for the debt and just pay the insurance claim back.
>  Which doesnt seem logical that they would care if the
> insurance company got there money or not.  They had a
> supposedly cc employee there.  They had a affidavit of the
> Collection Department  employee of the CC company to
> testify to absolutely nothing.  AND they have standing to
> sue me here because this is where I reside....  A few
> lawyers I know said the debt was assigned not bought or
> sold......  Does that mean there is no hope??????
> >
> > --- On Fri, 10/10/08, Creditwrench
> <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt
> Collection Discovery Requests
> > > To: "Creditwrench"
> <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > Date: Friday, October 10, 2008, 6:35 AM
> > > Persoally I don't think so. I'd far
> rather catch
> > > them in violations of
> > > FDCPA and take them to federal court then
> negotiate from
> > > there. Works
> > > much better.
> >
> > > On Oct 8, 6:02 pm, Lisa Angle
> > > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > is it smart to negotiate a judgement
> > > lisaangle0...@yahoo.com
> >
> > > > --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Replevin
> > > <AR.Consu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > From: Replevin
> <AR.Consu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Debt
> > > Collection Discovery Requests
> > > > > To: "Creditwrench"
> > > <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 1:28
> PM
> > > > > Hello,
> >
> > > > > I received a summons in July from a law
> office. I
> > > answered
> > > > > the summons
> > > > > within the 30 days allowed in GA.
> >
> > > > > On September 16th I received a
> Plantiff's
> > > Discovery
> > > > > Request packet
> > > > > dated for September 9th. On September
> 24 I
> > > receieved a
> > > > > letter from the
> > > > > law office  dated September 8th
> stating they had
> > > received
> > > > > my filed
> > > > > answers and they wanted to discuss the
> matter in
> > > further
> > > > > detail; and
> > > > > that their client does not wish to
> cause me any
> > > unnecessary
> > > > > inconvenience.
> >
> > > > > My question is do I have to answer the
> original
> > > > > Plaintiff's Discovery
> > > > > Request and which date do I use to
> calculate the
> > > 30 days
> > > > > stated in the
> > > > > Plaintiff's Discovery Request for
> my response
> > > to the
> > > > > interrogatories,
> > > > > request for admission and request to
> produce
> > > documents?
> >
> > > > > Thank you and this forum is great. As
> my schedule
> > > changes I
> > > > > plan to
> > > > > meet you all on the Friday
> teleconferences.
> >
> >
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

It makes no difference whether the debt collector attorney bought the
debt or not. None whatever. Attorneys attempting to collect a debt are
3rd party debt collectors whether they bought the debt or not. You
must learn the law iorder to make FDCPA law work for you. It is
obvious that you have not learned the law, what it says and how to
apply it to the immediate circumstance whatever it might be. First
thing is to have your recording process in place and ready to use at a
moments notice. You also need to have your caller I.D. working and
calls that don't show the name and number of the caller should be
ignored. Don't even pick up the phone. All calls to your home phone
should be call forwarded to your cell phone. That is because most cell
phones will allow you to put a name to each number that calls you so
you will know instantly who is calling you and debt collectors will
only get one chance to call you before you nail them with your caller
I.D. system. Even if they are a huge corporation with many different
phone lines you will soon have them all labeled and know instantly who
they are when they call. That's not so you can evade their calls but
so you can get your recording equipment turned on before you pick up
the phone. You should have a good digital voice recorder with you on
your person at all times just like you should have a decent digital
camera with you at all times in case of vehicle accidents. Keep your
batteries fresh and keep spare batteries for both with you at all
times. The reason is that if the call is from a debt collector your
memory will not recall everything they said or didn't say. You will
need to be able to review the call later so you can analyze it for
every possible violation and get them written down on paper and on
your computer as well. Write the contents of the call violations in
your word processor and then print out a copy and keep it in a folder
for the day you will need it all. My message board at http://consumers.creditwrench.com
has many articles written by attorneys which will teach you all you
need to know about FDCPA and FCRA violations and your rights under the
law. New articles come in every day. So keep up with the latest. No,
the situation is not hopeless. Far from it.


On Oct 11, 11:00 am, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> That would be great but I have not figured out how to prove the debt collector attorney bought the debt after they have a judgement.  They sued me before the credit card company charged off.  Then every lawyer says even if they chardged it off the credit card company has a right to sue you for the debt and just pay the insurance claim back.  Which doesnt seem logical that they would care if the insurance company got there money or not.  They had a supposedly cc employee there.  They had a affidavit of the Collection Department  employee of the CC company to testify to absolutely nothing.  AND they have standing to sue me here because this is where I reside....  A few lawyers I know said the debt was assigned not bought or sold......  Does that mean there is no hope??????
>
> --- On Fri, 10/10/08, Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> > To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Friday, October 10, 2008, 6:35 AM
> > Persoally I don't think so. I'd far rather catch
> > them in violations of
> > FDCPA and take them to federal court then negotiate from
> > there. Works
> > much better.
>
> > On Oct 8, 6:02 pm, Lisa Angle
> > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > is it smart to negotiate a judgement
> > lisaangle0...@yahoo.com
>
> > > --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Replevin
> > <AR.Consu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > From: Replevin <AR.Consu...@gmail.com>
> > > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Debt
> > Collection Discovery Requests
> > > > To: "Creditwrench"
> > <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > > Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 1:28 PM
> > > > Hello,
>
> > > > I received a summons in July from a law office. I
> > answered
> > > > the summons
> > > > within the 30 days allowed in GA.
>
> > > > On September 16th I received a Plantiff's
> > Discovery
> > > > Request packet
> > > > dated for September 9th. On September 24 I
> > receieved a
> > > > letter from the
> > > > law office  dated September 8th stating they had
> > received
> > > > my filed
> > > > answers and they wanted to discuss the matter in
> > further
> > > > detail; and
> > > > that their client does not wish to cause me any
> > unnecessary
> > > > inconvenience.
>
> > > > My question is do I have to answer the original
> > > > Plaintiff's Discovery
> > > > Request and which date do I use to calculate the
> > 30 days
> > > > stated in the
> > > > Plaintiff's Discovery Request for my response
> > to the
> > > > interrogatories,
> > > > request for admission and request to produce
> > documents?
>
> > > > Thank you and this forum is great. As my schedule
> > changes I
> > > > plan to
> > > > meet you all on the Friday teleconferences.
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---