[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

That would be great but I have not figured out how to prove the debt collector attorney bought the debt after they have a judgement. They sued me before the credit card company charged off. Then every lawyer says even if they chardged it off the credit card company has a right to sue you for the debt and just pay the insurance claim back. Which doesnt seem logical that they would care if the insurance company got there money or not. They had a supposedly cc employee there. They had a affidavit of the Collection Department employee of the CC company to testify to absolutely nothing. AND they have standing to sue me here because this is where I reside.... A few lawyers I know said the debt was assigned not bought or sold...... Does that mean there is no hope??????

--- On Fri, 10/10/08, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com>
> Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Friday, October 10, 2008, 6:35 AM
> Persoally I don't think so. I'd far rather catch
> them in violations of
> FDCPA and take them to federal court then negotiate from
> there. Works
> much better.
>
>
> On Oct 8, 6:02 pm, Lisa Angle
> <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > is it smart to negotiate a judgement
> lisaangle0...@yahoo.com
> >
> > --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Replevin
> <AR.Consu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Replevin <AR.Consu...@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Debt
> Collection Discovery Requests
> > > To: "Creditwrench"
> <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 1:28 PM
> > > Hello,
> >
> > > I received a summons in July from a law office. I
> answered
> > > the summons
> > > within the 30 days allowed in GA.
> >
> > > On September 16th I received a Plantiff's
> Discovery
> > > Request packet
> > > dated for September 9th. On September 24 I
> receieved a
> > > letter from the
> > > law office  dated September 8th stating they had
> received
> > > my filed
> > > answers and they wanted to discuss the matter in
> further
> > > detail; and
> > > that their client does not wish to cause me any
> unnecessary
> > > inconvenience.
> >
> > > My question is do I have to answer the original
> > > Plaintiff's Discovery
> > > Request and which date do I use to calculate the
> 30 days
> > > stated in the
> > > Plaintiff's Discovery Request for my response
> to the
> > > interrogatories,
> > > request for admission and request to produce
> documents?
> >
> > > Thank you and this forum is great. As my schedule
> changes I
> > > plan to
> > > meet you all on the Friday teleconferences.
> >
> >
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---