Persoally I don't think so. I'd far rather catch them in violations of
FDCPA and take them to federal court then negotiate from there. Works
much better.
On Oct 8, 6:02 pm, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> is it smart to negotiate a judgement lisaangle0...@yahoo.com
>
> --- On Wed, 10/8/08, Replevin <AR.Consu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Replevin <AR.Consu...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> > To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 1:28 PM
> > Hello,
>
> > I received a summons in July from a law office. I answered
> > the summons
> > within the 30 days allowed in GA.
>
> > On September 16th I received a Plantiff's Discovery
> > Request packet
> > dated for September 9th. On September 24 I receieved a
> > letter from the
> > law office dated September 8th stating they had received
> > my filed
> > answers and they wanted to discuss the matter in further
> > detail; and
> > that their client does not wish to cause me any unnecessary
> > inconvenience.
>
> > My question is do I have to answer the original
> > Plaintiff's Discovery
> > Request and which date do I use to calculate the 30 days
> > stated in the
> > Plaintiff's Discovery Request for my response to the
> > interrogatories,
> > request for admission and request to produce documents?
>
> > Thank you and this forum is great. As my schedule changes I
> > plan to
> > meet you all on the Friday teleconferences.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Posts
