Wednesday, August 19, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] creditwrench's Google Docs links

I've shared a document with you:

creditwrench's Google Docs links
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AXMijLsjZEu-ZGZibmJtdl80NWdwcTlia2Rm&hl=en&invite=CL7z2ekB

It's not an attachment -- it's stored online at Google Docs. To open this
document, just click the link above.

Sharing my links, editorials and tutorials with the group.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

A web page archived by CREDITWRENCH has been shared with you

A web page archived by CREDITWRENCH has been shared with you through iterasi with this personal note included:

"Learn how to fignt back against an illegal arbitration attempt. Creditwrench leads the way in teaching how to do that."

You can view this page by clicking on the link below:

https://www.iterasi.net/public/archive/Xp4sKG-l40WfDpDoF3XZ3Q

(If the above link does not work, please copy and paste it into your browser)

The web changes so fast. Save and share your web pages before they go away.

Sign up today for iterasi:
https://www.iterasi.net/AccountSignUpWizard/AccountInfo.aspx

Cheers,
The iterasi team

P.S. For more information about iterasi, go to http://www.iterasi.net and watch our screencast about how to save web pages and share them with friends and colleagues.

Please do not reply to this e-mail. This is an automated message from iterasi. If you need help please email us at support@iterasi.com

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH TV] Capital One law su its

On Jun 22, 10:33 pm, Byron Penoyer <barneyla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> last question.....what documents should I accept for validation of the debt?
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Arbitration is extremely difficult to combat. The only way you can do
> > it is send the attorney a demand for validation of the debt upon first
> > notice that they want to arbitrate. Of course, they will probably
> > ignore that and then as soon as they move forward to arbitration sue
> > the lawyer in federal court for illegal continued collection activity.
> > If you don't get that demand for validation out within the first 30
> > days after the attorney's first contact with you then you won't have a
> > cause of action and the arbitration will go forward, be granted and
> > then sent to your local court to have it reduced to a judgment.
>
> > On Jun 22, 2:00 am, "barneyla...@juno.com" <barneyla...@juno.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Thank you for your quick response in regard to my credit card closure.
>
> > > My last question for my issue is that, If I have a copy of my agreement
> > with my credit union/credit card agreement, how will I have a case against a
> > debt collector if this case is sent to arbitration?
>
> > > Byron

Your agreement is with the credit card company who is the original
creditor and therefore will not give you a cause of action against the
original creditor since FDCOA states that original creditors are not
liable under FDCPA. They might be liable under your state law however.
Another problem might arise if you attempt to use the credit card
agreement as your cause of action and that is whether or not the debt
collector bought the debt and if so did the terms and conditions of
the card agreement transfer to the purchaser at the time of the sale.
It would require a judicial decision to determine that matter.
Attempting to use the card agreement as giving a cause of action would
be a slippery slope at best.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Monday, June 22, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH TV] Capital One law su its

last question.....what documents should I accept for validation of the debt?



On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

Arbitration is extremely difficult to combat. The only way you can do
it is send the attorney a demand for validation of the debt upon first
notice that they want to arbitrate. Of course, they will probably
ignore that and then as soon as they move forward to arbitration sue
the lawyer in federal court for illegal continued collection activity.
If you don't get that demand for validation out within the first 30
days after the attorney's first contact with you then you won't have a
cause of action and the arbitration will go forward, be granted and
then sent to your local court to have it reduced to a judgment.

On Jun 22, 2:00 am, "barneyla...@juno.com" <barneyla...@juno.com>
wrote:
> Thank you for your quick response in regard to my credit card closure.
>
> My last question for my issue is that, If I have a copy of my agreement with my credit union/credit card agreement, how will I have a case against a debt collector if this case is sent to arbitration?
>
> Byron
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Criminal Lawyers - Click here.http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTOVoJoG7csX8LfLn0vQ...




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH TV] Capital One law su its

Arbitration is extremely difficult to combat. The only way you can do
it is send the attorney a demand for validation of the debt upon first
notice that they want to arbitrate. Of course, they will probably
ignore that and then as soon as they move forward to arbitration sue
the lawyer in federal court for illegal continued collection activity.
If you don't get that demand for validation out within the first 30
days after the attorney's first contact with you then you won't have a
cause of action and the arbitration will go forward, be granted and
then sent to your local court to have it reduced to a judgment.

On Jun 22, 2:00 am, "barneyla...@juno.com" <barneyla...@juno.com>
wrote:
> Thank you for your quick response in regard to my credit card closure.
>
> My last question for my issue is that, If I have a copy of my agreement with my credit union/credit card agreement, how will I have a case against a debt collector if this case is sent to arbitration?
>
> Byron
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Criminal Lawyers - Click here.http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTOVoJoG7csX8LfLn0vQ...

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH TV] Capital One law su its

Thank you for your quick response in regard to my credit card closure.

My last question for my issue is that, If I have a copy of my agreement with my credit union/credit card agreement, how will I have a case against a debt collector if this case is sent to arbitration?

Byron

____________________________________________________________
Criminal Lawyers - Click here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTOVoJoG7csX8LfLn0vQz44yMGNmElj2Hm2DC4KuykMyoOYxv4FhHS/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Sunday, June 21, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH TV] Capital One law suits

On Jun 20, 9:45 pm, "barneyla...@juno.com" <barneyla...@juno.com>
wrote:
> Bill, you have been a godsend to the common man!!  Thank you for all of your contributions.  Could I ask a brief question?  
>
> My credit union recently closed my credit card account without any reason, although they did close it within 1 hour of an email asking for a
> lower interest rate.   They also closed my line of credit of $1000 without explanation.   No big deal, as I was set to pay this off and close the account.
> The original agreement in writing was for a slightly lower rate.  I have a copy of the agreement.  What now is my best option for this account?   Should I
> let it go to collections, and then negotiate a lower rate?  Should I challenge the balance of the debt?  Should I offer a lower settlement?   What should
> I look for as far as violations, and federal challenge?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Byron Penoyer
> Lansing  MI
>
> barneyla...@juno.com
>
You have to pick and choose between your options. Your first option,
of course, is to just pay it off and forget about it before it goes to
collections. Of course, you would need the funds available to pay it
all off as installments won't be likely to help much in terms of
credit ratings. The second option is to let it go to a debt collector
and then catch the debt collector violating the law and sue them in
federal court before they send it to an attorney. The third option is
to wait until the debt collector files a lawsuit and then go after
both the attorney and the debt collector in federal court. I like the
second option better because it prevents the debt collector from doing
anything at all if it is done correctly. You don't even need a lawyer.
all you need to do is become a creditwrench student and you will learn
all this stuff very quickly.

I'm working on a new project right now that should prove very
interesting and make learning this stuff much easier than it is now.
It involves what is known as virtual computers. I already have two of
them set up and working using Windows 7 Beta. Next week I will be
setting up a real server system and then will set up a virtual server
from that. The virtual server will host a new website as well as doing
other tasks. Once the virtual server is up and running I will get a
domain name for that and set up a virtual web site from that. The
virtual website will allow my students to have their own private
section or web site with their name on it and it will contain all the
lessons and court cases they will need to get the job done. Each
student's web site will be totally private and password protected.
Nobody will even know it is there and it won't show up in any search
engines. This whole idea of virtual computers and virtual servers is
pretty new in the tech world so I really don't know what all can be
done with it but it is pretty amazing stuff. Windows 7 (Vista 2) Beta
is available now and Windows 8 will be in a few months if not sooner.
It is a whole new world in computing technology.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Saturday, June 20, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH TV] Capital One law suits

Bill, you have been a godsend to the common man!! Thank you for all of your contributions. Could I ask a brief question?

My credit union recently closed my credit card account without any reason, although they did close it within 1 hour of an email asking for a
lower interest rate. They also closed my line of credit of $1000 without explanation. No big deal, as I was set to pay this off and close the account.
The original agreement in writing was for a slightly lower rate. I have a copy of the agreement. What now is my best option for this account? Should I
let it go to collections, and then negotiate a lower rate? Should I challenge the balance of the debt? Should I offer a lower settlement? What should
I look for as far as violations, and federal challenge?

Thank you!

Byron Penoyer
Lansing MI

barneyland4@juno.com

____________________________________________________________
Criminal Lawyers - Click here.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTOVoIxse9Lhm22ZvHUwKBc7aybcHmLjaLZGzX7JToqeqhTe0s1a1q/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH] I have a great deal of creditcar...

In a message dated 5/20/2009 4:21:09 AM Eastern Standard Time, creditwrench@gmail.com writes:
Subject: credit card debt
Question: i have amounted a great deal of credit card debt and when my husband lost his job a few yeas ago we couldn't pay. we are a a time when we can begin to repay some of these debts and are trying to do so one at a time.. i obviously can't pay them all at once. i have a law firm sending me letters of intent to sue over $10000 owed to citibank. i spoke to a rep that told me that they would deduct 200 for the next to months from my checking to show an intent to pay while i finish out the pay arrangements with other creditor. and then we would discuss settlement. however the check hasn't been withdrawn and I recd another letter from them with an intent to sue.. what do i do at this point? should i make the payment myself directly? can they still sue? What is my next step?

Answer:

click here to enlarge
They can sue you and they can garnish wages, seize bank accounts, possibly seize vehicles that are free and clear of debt, boats, trailers or anything that has a title to it registered with the department of motor vehicles in your state. It is also conceivable that they could send a sheriff to your home to see what they can find to sell. You need to become a creditwrench student and learn how to keep them from grabbing everything you have.
My God, your answer to this lady's question is as threatening as a debt collector bottom feeder. Is this "your" scare tactic to get someone to become a creditwrench student?  I think the people reading your web site have been thur enough sleepless nights and stress from debt collectors that they don't need you making things worse so that you can make a $'s off them. Your not trying to help anyone. Your trying to scare them into handing you what little money they do have. Is there a name for someone that feeds off the bottomfeeders..? That has to be the very low of lows...
Shame, Shame on you !!

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

ARM Firm Responds to Hidden Camera Footage on Dateline

March 30, 2009

An ARM company that was highlighted in a Dateline NBC hidden camera segment responds to the show’s use of their employees.

Fired for telling the truth for once. These four debt collectors lost their jobs because they told the truth for once and got caught admitting what the truth about the debt collection industry really is and how it abuses those who fall prey to their evil methods. Naturally they got fired. No executive in his right mind would allow nincompoops like that around to tell more stories out of school. And of course, Inside Arm which is the mouthpiece rag for the debt collection industry had to put out a whitewash of the expose trying to help clean up the mess. What else would we expect? Par for the course.


The president of an accounts receivable management company that was featured prominently in a Dateline NBC story Friday night on the debt collection industry responded to the spot in a letter addressing some hidden camera footage aired in the piece.

The segment, part of Dateline’s series “Inside the Financial Fiasco,” aired Friday night on NBC. In it, debt collectors from an agency near Buffalo, N.Y. were shown discussing their business outside a bar after work. The person asking questions and engaging the conversation – under the guise of inquiring about employment opportunities -- was outfitted with a hidden camera and microphone.

Global Connect: Strategic Voice Broadcasting

No Extra Fees. Increased Capacity. Real Time Reports.

You are in COMPLETE CONTROL of your broadcast.

Click here for more information...

The footage showed a handful of people claiming to be debt collectors discussing behavior that is not allowed under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Collectors said that they led consumers to believe lawsuit filings were imminent, called consumers’ supervisors at home, and even reveled in the fact that illegal actions were necessary to effectively do their jobs.

Although involving no more that four collectors, the exchange was held up as an example of the attitudes in the ARM industry as a whole.

Wayne Lewis, president of the company that employs the people on camera, LHR, Inc. of Hamburg, N.Y., issued a response letter Friday after viewing the footage on Dateline’s Web site in advance of the airing.

“These comments were completely irresponsible and not reflective of our company’s practices,” said Lewis in the letter.

Lewis told insideARM that they are diligent about hiring the right people and offer extensive education and training once they bring employees on board. Even then, “you can’t control what people say outside of work,” he noted.

The letter also said that LHR was in the process of terminating the employees shown on the video. Lewis confirmed Monday that the workers were no longer with LHR.

“The comments shown on Dateline are not representative of the ARM industry as a whole,” said Mike Ginsberg, CEO of ARM advisory firm Kaulkin Ginsberg. “Dateline’s approach was to over-exemplify the renegade practices of a few individuals rather than portraying the ethical, law-abiding practices of the masses of collection professionals every day.”
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [CREDITWRENCH TV] Blogtalkradio shows for 2008

None of the links work.....

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:
Here are some new Creditwrench Blogtalkradio shows.

12-01-08


12-08-08


12-15-08


12-22-08


12-29-08



--
Posted By Creditwrench to CREDITWRENCH TV at 1/06/2009 11:40:00 AM



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Saturday, January 3, 2009

[creditwrench newsletter] sue the repo man

Looking for information on suing the repo man can someone point me in the right direction.
Can someone show me where to get case law on the following

Count 1) Harassment
Count 2) Defamation of Character
Count 3) Slander
Count 4) Breach of the Peace
Count 5) Numerous Violations of the FDCPA
Count 6) Causing unnecessary emotional distress
Count 7) Embarrass

The repo man has came into my work twice and threaten me I have told him to put everything in writing they refuse.
The repo man has told third party employees my personal business.
The repo man told my mother & father in law my personal business.

I have filed a police report and the police are making them stay away from my work but they continue to call my mother in law and threaten her and share my information.

What Can I do and can anyone point me in the right direction.

Laura
Cleveland, Ohio
DonaldCzr@aol.com Husbands email

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Thursday, December 18, 2008

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [creditwrench] Thursday night conference call with Richard Cornforth.com

Okay....I'll be there.  Andrea 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 12/18/08 08:09:33
Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] [creditwrench] Thursday night conference call with Richard Cornforth.com
 
Thursday night conference call with Richard Cornforth

Tomorrow, Thursday night, December 18th we will be holding a conference call with Richard Cornforth. The call will start at 7:00 P.M. central time and will last until 9:00 P.M. This is a free call with no charge or obligation except that which your telephone company might charge you for long distance. Nobody will attempt to sell you anything nor attempt to get you to do or not do anything. It is strictly for informational purposes.

The call will be an actual meeting of Richard Cornforth's J~accuse group with Richard Cornforth presiding. Callers attending the meeting via the conference call instead of actually attending the meeting will be asked to follow the format of the meeting and not attempt to hold conversations with other callers. All questions will be directed to Richard Cornforth and he will be the only one answering questions. Please use *6 to mute yourself until the time comes to allow people to ask questions. When you ask questions please identify yourself by first name only and tell us what state and city you are from.

Richard usually starts each bimonthly meeting off with a lesson about something or other often about IRS or debt collection. Please listen quietly until the moderator opens the floor to questions then you can feel free to jump in and ask questions.

The meeting will start promptly at 7:00 P.M. and will be set up a couple of minutes prior to the start of the meeting by the moderator.

Richard Cornforth is a nationally known public speaker and travels extensively giving seminars in many cities each year.

The call in number and pin is:. 1-712-432-1601 Pin is 508548#


--
Posted By Creditwrench to creditwrench at 12/17/2008 06:17:00 P
 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Saturday, December 13, 2008

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [creditwrench] Garnishment against pensioners i...

Yes, it is 5 years on a written contract.
If they sue her she should be able to win easily.

>
> If she's still in Florida, I think the Statute of Limitations has run out for
> anyone to do anything to her. I think Florida's SOL is 4 or 5 years.
> If I were her, my "immediate" next step would be to file a suit against this
> collection agency in Federal Court. We all probably wish we were in this
> lady's shoes :-)....
>
> **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and
> favorite sites in one place.  Try it now.
> (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolco...)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [creditwrench] Garnishment against pensioners i...

robert




Subject: Capitol One Credit Card debt from 2002
Question:
QUESTION: I have just received a letter from my bank here in NY that my checking account funds are being withheld, and a copy of the Restraining Notice and Judgment for a Capitol One CC debt from 2002 when I lived in Florida. The account is a direct deposit $459.00 pension account only.

I immediately called the banks legal department and then the collection company and spoke to the attorney there who is handling my case. I explained to him that I paid on that CC only the charges that were mine and not the charges that were scammed by someone other than myself or anyone I know, and the charges were dismissed against me. However, he claims that I now owe for those charges, plus all the late fees since 2002. The amount of the charges were less than $1000 and the total debt is now over $6000. I shredded all my paperwork from Florida when I left there and do not have any proof of the CC statements. Big Mistake!

I relocated back to New York State in 2002. I am 65; retired in 2000; divorced in 1991 and pay QDRO from my pension to my ex that leaves me with a $459/month pension; have no real property; a 1996 Blazer with 135,000 miles in fair to poor condition; rent apartment with a 72 yo female companion where we share the expenses.

Any advice you can give me would be appreciated. Thank you.
 
If she's still in Florida, I think the Statute of Limitations has run out for anyone to do anything to her. I think Florida's SOL is 4 or 5 years.
If I were her, my "immediate" next step would be to file a suit against this collection agency in Federal Court. We all probably wish we were in this lady's shoes :-)....





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: [creditwrench] Garnishment against pensioners i...

Statute of Limitations for Florida is 4 or 5 years..Where does she live ?



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Monday, October 13, 2008

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

I feel safe in saying that if one were to file a rico case against a
debt collector or attorney they would be more likely to settle out of
court than take it all the way to a full blown trial. But that is also
true in almost any other type of federal case but to claim there would
never be a record of it is dead wrong. The case(s) will always be on
Pacer for all to see. The actual terms of settlement would not be
there however because of confidentiality agreements.

Proving a fraud upon the court is not likely to get any results. In
fact, your complaint is not likely to even get heard.

The fact that a 3rd party debt collector sued in the name of the
original creditor is not a fraud upon the court. In fact, the U.S.
Supreme Court has ruled that it is perfectly acceptable for an
assignee to do that. But there is a huge difference between an
assignee and a junk debt buyer. The Supremes said it was OK for an
assignee to sue in the name of the original creditor but said nothing
about junk debt buyers so who knows whether the JDBs were included or
not. Arguments about holders in due course, Parties of true first
interest and all of those types of arguments have traditionally failed
and will most likely always fail in the future. The only notable
exception to that may be in mortgage foreclosure cases. That sceneario
is still unfolding and in fact I may have discovered a new bombshell
to throw into that arena as well as into the credit card cases. Of
course, there are still several other bombshells that will soon be
exploded on the mortgage meltdown battlefield. The $700 billion
bailout will soon prove to have had exactly the opposite effect that
which was intended. It will not improve the stability of the money
markets or the banks but rather will soon trash the entire economic
system and quite possibly on a global scale.

Yes, I do feel that they have an ironclad case against you and I
assure you that any arguments or defenses you raise in any local court
will fail no matter who tells you differently. You can file motions to
vacate arguably void judgments until the sun falls out of the sky and
you will most likely lose every time. On top of that you may well end
up getting sanctioned in some way as a vexatious litigant yet it may
well be that you will have to file a couple of such motions in order
to come up with
new causes of action which you could use to take them to federal
court.

You ask whether or not one should argue the proposition that if they
have no contract they have no case and whether or not that is an
argument that I advocate using. The answer is that yes, that is quite
often a necessary argument but only because one must argue something
or stand mute before the court and take one's lumps which is what is
going to happen no matter what one argues. Sometimes those arguments
do work but the odds are against the defendant no matter what his
defense might be. Plaintiffs have traditionally lied to the courts and
won their cases no matter how preposterous their claims might be. One
must fight against almost unsurmountable odds regardless of the
outcome. This economic meltdown is going to get so bad that people
will be getting sued in ever increasing numbers. If I were to be sued
for a credit card default or anything else I would go in expecting to
lose no matter what I argued or what trick I employed trying to win. I
would lose no matter what I did or said. But I would also have a
carefully prepared federal case against the lawyer. I would have all
of their violations carefully documented. As soon as the debt
collector turned the case to an attorney I would immediately file a
federal case against the debt collector then start going after
violations by the attorney and once the local case was over I would
then file a federal case against the both of them. Both cases would
most likely be settled out of court. I would lose in local court and
win in federal but the only way that can be done is by having a
careful record of their violations they can't argue their way out of
any more than I could in local court. The only realistic reason for
filing motions to vacate is to give them the opportunity to provide me
with fresh causes of action in federal court.
Even if they get a judgment and proceed to garnishment I will then be
able to get more causes of action in the garnishment hearings and
subsequent proceedings. Just because they have a garnishment in place
does not mean they cannot violate. In fact that is a fertile field in
which to generate more violations, more causes of action.

You speak of SOL defenses. Those can be good arguments if they are
actually valid but once they have a judgment in place your SOL
arguments are all down the tubes even though they might turn out to be
your cause of action in federal court. Judges typically won't listen
to SOL arguments unless you can prove when you made your last payment
to the creditor beyond any shadow of a doubt.

Again, at this point in time I have no idea whether you have any
causes of action or not and I am not advocating that you do anything
until you do have. I do not advocate filing rico cases because they
are fraught with many problems and are risky at best. They can be won
but I think only by well experienced attorneys who really know what
they are doing. Certainly not by pro se litigants who have no such
experience. As to motions to vacate void judgments, I'm sure that
thousands have been filed all across the land due to the preachings of
Richard Cornforth and many
of his followers but the record of success has been dismal indeed. It
is likely that less than 1 percent have ever been successful. So
let's forget about what Richard Cornforth or anybody else teaches or
has said and move forward to either finding causes of action or
generating some in the future.


On Oct 13, 4:42 am, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well if Richard is your friend your friend also says that when you file a rico case debt collector attornys settle out of court maybe that is why?!
> If they settle out of court there will never be a record of it.
>
> I agree I have no hope unless I can find away to prove fraud upon the court that the debt collector attorneys were not suing for Citibank which is what your whole program is sold on. The problem is I have not been able to find away to prove they bought the debt. Seems like they can lie or hide that well if that is what they are doing.
>
> Consumer attorneys are out their who and they put on their website they are experienced in the FDCPA believe me when they tell me something I will go to the law library and research what they say to make sure they are telling me the truth.
>
> So let me understand this completely what you are saying is that with the information I have provided thusfar you feel they have an iron clad case against me. Now do you think they were suing for Citibank not themselves?
>
> Your pleading for court in new york stated a whole different view point and yet you feel you are going to win!!!! They could not produce a signed contract said I had made the agreement on the phone. Is that not in your pleading NO CONTRACT no case. I have to admit this is all very confusing to be fair to Richard on each of those points in your pleading; standing, no written contract, etc etc has anyone won?????
>
> your right it is starting to go that way going to court doesnt seem like you have a very good chance of winning after they get a judgement..... Unless they serve you imporperly and you can raise th SOL!!!!!!
>
> Thank you
> Lisa
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

Well if Richard is your friend your friend also says that when you file a rico case debt collector attornys settle out of court maybe that is why?!
If they settle out of court there will never be a record of it.

I agree I have no hope unless I can find away to prove fraud upon the court that the debt collector attorneys were not suing for Citibank which is what your whole program is sold on. The problem is I have not been able to find away to prove they bought the debt. Seems like they can lie or hide that well if that is what they are doing.

Consumer attorneys are out their who and they put on their website they are experienced in the FDCPA believe me when they tell me something I will go to the law library and research what they say to make sure they are telling me the truth.

So let me understand this completely what you are saying is that with the information I have provided thusfar you feel they have an iron clad case against me. Now do you think they were suing for Citibank not themselves?

Your pleading for court in new york stated a whole different view point and yet you feel you are going to win!!!! They could not produce a signed contract said I had made the agreement on the phone. Is that not in your pleading NO CONTRACT no case. I have to admit this is all very confusing to be fair to Richard on each of those points in your pleading; standing, no written contract, etc etc has anyone won?????

your right it is starting to go that way going to court doesnt seem like you have a very good chance of winning after they get a judgement..... Unless they serve you imporperly and you can raise th SOL!!!!!!

Thank you
Lisa

--- On Mon, 10/13/08, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com>
> Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Monday, October 13, 2008, 12:40 AM
> Richard Cornforth says file a Rico case? OK. But how many
> such cases
> has he won? I know Richard very well as a personal friend
> but still,
> how many Rico cases has he ever won or even taught anyone
> else how to
> win? None! That's how many. Bud Hibbs says take the
> judgment to a good
> consumer advocate? Where will you find one of those?
> I'm not telling you that you can file a federal case
> and win. You
> might if you have at least one valid cause of action that
> you can
> prove. You are not going to get the judgment overturned in
> local court
> and you aren't going to get a federal court to overturn
> it either. All
> I'm trying to do is see if we can find a viable cause
> of action and
> until that can be done you should not be worried about
> going to court.
> There will be time for that if and when we come up with
> some good
> causes of action that are still within the statute of
> limitations.
> So let's quit worrying about Richard, Bud or any
> lawyers. If you don't
> have a cause of action you aren't going to go anywhere.
>
>
> On Oct 12, 10:41 pm, Lisa Angle
> <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Notary was colleen McConnel whos commissioned expired
> Oct 11, 2008 which my case was heard in 2006.(Its not hard
> to become a notary though)  They had no idea I was going to
> dig up the number and call.  I used a calling card, pay
> phone and asked for Pam Davis they sent me to her office and
> gave me an extension.  Yet I have to admit I never talked
> to her personally as what was I going to say?  The company
> was Citicorp Credit Servicss Inc.  I called the state
> liscensing place, they had info.  How I got the number to
> call them actually, and newspaper web site with stories
> about them.  The better business place.  I did as much
> digging as I could come up with in my mind and had no luck
> at proving anything fraudulant.  Then check out the website
> of the lawyers, they make quite a big claim as a debt
> collector law firm the name was Spotts and Fain from
> Richmond virginia.  Yet I still think something is a miss
> as Citibank got a judgement and charged off the
> >  acoount, then Spotts and Fain passed the torch to
> another law firm next to Washington DC..... They claim
> Citibank hired them.  Somewhere I read that if you called
> the credit card company that after they charged off a debt
> they would say you owe them zero dollars.  They did not
> tell me that when I called very recently (September I
> believe)  I am not trying to challenge your word with these
> emails just trying to find out how to Prove with hard
> evidence what you are saying before I go back to court.
>  Another point is that you say you can win if Federal Court
> but if you bring a frivolous case to federal court you go to
> jail.  The State court saw it as frivolous.  I tried
> looking up these type of court cases in Federal court which
> is in Downtown Norfolk and have found NOTHING
> published...... from the state of Virginia location....
>  Sorry once bitten twice shy in this court business....
>  Richard Cornforth says you have to bring a Rico Case
> against them.  Bud
> >  Hibbs says go to a Consumer Lawyer with the
> judgement  I am not sure at theis point what to do.  
> >
> > --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench
> <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt
> Collection Discovery Requests
> > > To: "Creditwrench"
> <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 8:00 PM
> > > Pam Davis, eh? Well who was the notary then? Who
> notarized
> > > that
> > > affidavit? So what name did they answer the phone
> by when
> > > you called
> > > them? Who is this supposed subsidiary of the CC
> company?
> >
> > > So the judge don't like Pro  Se litigants,
> eh? Well
> > > nothing unusual
> > > about that. It is very difficult for pro se
> litigants to
> > > win in local
> > > court but pretty easy for them to win in federal
> court.
> >
> > > On Oct 12, 5:36 pm, Lisa Angle
> > > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > one they sent valadation supposedly the
> photo copies
> > > of the credit card slips which I know was not
> legal now
> > > really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who
> Works for
> > > subsidary of the credit card company which is
> supposedly
> > > where the Credit Card company sends there debt
> collections
> > > stating  the copies were from CC company and she
> was
> > > notorizing it to that fact.  The notary stamp
> was from
> > > Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my
> research
> > > called the company she worked for and found that
> she was
> > > there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card
> company....
> > >  The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt
> collector
> > > etc etc etc.  It is on all correspondance.
>  They did send
> > > the first letter and I did ask for verification
> and they
> > > sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in
> the court.
> > >  When I went to court my biggest mistake was I
> went into a
> > > General District court quoting case study and you
> cannot
> > > when at that level on case study.  They only had
> an oral
> > > >  contract with me and I thought I had it
> nailed but
> > > the judge through the book at me and threatened
> to put me in
> > > jail...  He did not like pro se litigation and
> definately
> > > has a relationship with the attornies that go in
> there..
> > >  You truly do not get a fair trial in this
> state....  Bud
> > > Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and
> they work
> > > for the naca I think.....  Claim they are
> familiar with the
> > > FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and
> on.....As for
> > > why go to the law library my answer to that is I
> have a
> > > retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps
> me with
> > > stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is
> why.  
> >
> > > > --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench
> > > <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > From: Creditwrench
> <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re:
> Debt
> > > Collection Discovery Requests
> > > > > To: "Creditwrench"
> > > <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > > > > The affidavit should be more than
> enough to get
> > > the job done
> > > > > if it
> > > > > contains any false and misleading
> information
> > > which most of
> > > > > them do.
> > > > > The first thing to look at in analyzing
> > > affidavits is to
> > > > > look at the
> > > > > notary and the seal to see what state
> the notary
> > > is located
> > > > > in. If the
> > > > > notary is not from your home state then
> it was
> > > probably
> > > > > generated by
> > > > > the debt collector. So who is the
> notary in your
> > > case, what
> > > > > state is
> > > > > the notary from and who is the affiant?
> So they
> > > never sent
> > > > > you any
> > > > > letters, but rather just filed the
> lawsuit on
> > > you, eh? That
> > > > > may be
> > > > > another violation if they did not have
> the full
> > > miranda
> > > > > warning on the
> > > > > complaint. If the full miranda was not
> on the
> > > complaint
> > > > > anywhere did
> > > > > they have a letter in your hands within
> 5 days of
> > > the
> > > > > service of the
> > > > > summons upon you? If not then you have
> another
> > > violation.
> > > > > There are
> > > > > many more ways to get violations.
> >
> > > > > You guess you need to find a consumer
> attorney?
> > > Where are
> > > > > you going to
> > > > > find a good one that knows what he is
> doing?
> > > There
> > > > > aren't many of
> > > > > those out there so if you want to get
> the job
> > > done you have
> > > > > to learn
> > > > > how to do it yourself and that is what
> I teach.
> > > And why do
> > > > > you want to
> > > > > waste time going to the law library to
> look up
> > > the FDCPA
> > > > > when it is
> > > > > readily available on the web?
> >
> > > > > On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> > > > > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > ok well these attorney's never
> called me
> > > not even
> > > > > once only sent letters.  They brought
> a witness
> > > to court
> > > > > and an affidavit so they never
> testified as
> > > attornies are
> > > > > not allowed to testify in a court for
> the cc
> > > company.  No I
> > > > > cant figure out how to use the FDCPA
> under these
> > > > > circumstances but I guess next step is
> to try a
> > > consumer
> > > > > attorney who is specialized in the
> FDCPA....  I
> > > will try to
> > > > > go by the law library and read the
> FDCPA to see
> > > if I can
> > > > > find anything.....    
> >
> >
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Sunday, October 12, 2008

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

Richard Cornforth says file a Rico case? OK. But how many such cases
has he won? I know Richard very well as a personal friend but still,
how many Rico cases has he ever won or even taught anyone else how to
win? None! That's how many. Bud Hibbs says take the judgment to a good
consumer advocate? Where will you find one of those?
I'm not telling you that you can file a federal case and win. You
might if you have at least one valid cause of action that you can
prove. You are not going to get the judgment overturned in local court
and you aren't going to get a federal court to overturn it either. All
I'm trying to do is see if we can find a viable cause of action and
until that can be done you should not be worried about going to court.
There will be time for that if and when we come up with some good
causes of action that are still within the statute of limitations.
So let's quit worrying about Richard, Bud or any lawyers. If you don't
have a cause of action you aren't going to go anywhere.


On Oct 12, 10:41 pm, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Notary was colleen McConnel whos commissioned expired Oct 11, 2008 which my case was heard in 2006.(Its not hard to become a notary though)  They had no idea I was going to dig up the number and call.  I used a calling card, pay phone and asked for Pam Davis they sent me to her office and gave me an extension.  Yet I have to admit I never talked to her personally as what was I going to say?  The company was Citicorp Credit Servicss Inc.  I called the state liscensing place, they had info.  How I got the number to call them actually, and newspaper web site with stories about them.  The better business place.  I did as much digging as I could come up with in my mind and had no luck at proving anything fraudulant.  Then check out the website of the lawyers, they make quite a big claim as a debt collector law firm the name was Spotts and Fain from Richmond virginia.  Yet I still think something is a miss as Citibank got a judgement and charged off the
>  acoount, then Spotts and Fain passed the torch to another law firm next to Washington DC..... They claim Citibank hired them.  Somewhere I read that if you called the credit card company that after they charged off a debt they would say you owe them zero dollars.  They did not tell me that when I called very recently (September I believe)  I am not trying to challenge your word with these emails just trying to find out how to Prove with hard evidence what you are saying before I go back to court.  Another point is that you say you can win if Federal Court but if you bring a frivolous case to federal court you go to jail.  The State court saw it as frivolous.  I tried looking up these type of court cases in Federal court which is in Downtown Norfolk and have found NOTHING published...... from the state of Virginia location....  Sorry once bitten twice shy in this court business....  Richard Cornforth says you have to bring a Rico Case against them.  Bud
>  Hibbs says go to a Consumer Lawyer with the judgement  I am not sure at theis point what to do.  
>
> --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> > To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 8:00 PM
> > Pam Davis, eh? Well who was the notary then? Who notarized
> > that
> > affidavit? So what name did they answer the phone by when
> > you called
> > them? Who is this supposed subsidiary of the CC company?
>
> > So the judge don't like Pro  Se litigants, eh? Well
> > nothing unusual
> > about that. It is very difficult for pro se litigants to
> > win in local
> > court but pretty easy for them to win in federal court.
>
> > On Oct 12, 5:36 pm, Lisa Angle
> > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies
> > of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now
> > really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for
> > subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly
> > where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections
> > stating  the copies were from CC company and she was
> > notorizing it to that fact.  The notary stamp was from
> > Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research
> > called the company she worked for and found that she was
> > there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company....
> >  The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector
> > etc etc etc.  It is on all correspondance.  They did send
> > the first letter and I did ask for verification and they
> > sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court.
> >  When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a
> > General District court quoting case study and you cannot
> > when at that level on case study.  They only had an oral
> > >  contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but
> > the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in
> > jail...  He did not like pro se litigation and definately
> > has a relationship with the attornies that go in there..
> >  You truly do not get a fair trial in this state....  Bud
> > Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work
> > for the naca I think.....  Claim they are familiar with the
> > FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for
> > why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a
> > retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with
> > stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.  
>
> > > --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench
> > <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt
> > Collection Discovery Requests
> > > > To: "Creditwrench"
> > <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > > > The affidavit should be more than enough to get
> > the job done
> > > > if it
> > > > contains any false and misleading information
> > which most of
> > > > them do.
> > > > The first thing to look at in analyzing
> > affidavits is to
> > > > look at the
> > > > notary and the seal to see what state the notary
> > is located
> > > > in. If the
> > > > notary is not from your home state then it was
> > probably
> > > > generated by
> > > > the debt collector. So who is the notary in your
> > case, what
> > > > state is
> > > > the notary from and who is the affiant? So they
> > never sent
> > > > you any
> > > > letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on
> > you, eh? That
> > > > may be
> > > > another violation if they did not have the full
> > miranda
> > > > warning on the
> > > > complaint. If the full miranda was not on the
> > complaint
> > > > anywhere did
> > > > they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of
> > the
> > > > service of the
> > > > summons upon you? If not then you have another
> > violation.
> > > > There are
> > > > many more ways to get violations.
>
> > > > You guess you need to find a consumer attorney?
> > Where are
> > > > you going to
> > > > find a good one that knows what he is doing?
> > There
> > > > aren't many of
> > > > those out there so if you want to get the job
> > done you have
> > > > to learn
> > > > how to do it yourself and that is what I teach.
> > And why do
> > > > you want to
> > > > waste time going to the law library to look up
> > the FDCPA
> > > > when it is
> > > > readily available on the web?
>
> > > > On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> > > > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > ok well these attorney's never called me
> > not even
> > > > once only sent letters.  They brought a witness
> > to court
> > > > and an affidavit so they never testified as
> > attornies are
> > > > not allowed to testify in a court for the cc
> > company.  No I
> > > > cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> > > > circumstances but I guess next step is to try a
> > consumer
> > > > attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I
> > will try to
> > > > go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see
> > if I can
> > > > find anything.....    
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

Notary was colleen McConnel whos commissioned expired Oct 11, 2008 which my case was heard in 2006.(Its not hard to become a notary though) They had no idea I was going to dig up the number and call. I used a calling card, pay phone and asked for Pam Davis they sent me to her office and gave me an extension. Yet I have to admit I never talked to her personally as what was I going to say? The company was Citicorp Credit Servicss Inc. I called the state liscensing place, they had info. How I got the number to call them actually, and newspaper web site with stories about them. The better business place. I did as much digging as I could come up with in my mind and had no luck at proving anything fraudulant. Then check out the website of the lawyers, they make quite a big claim as a debt collector law firm the name was Spotts and Fain from Richmond virginia. Yet I still think something is a miss as Citibank got a judgement and charged off the
acoount, then Spotts and Fain passed the torch to another law firm next to Washington DC..... They claim Citibank hired them. Somewhere I read that if you called the credit card company that after they charged off a debt they would say you owe them zero dollars. They did not tell me that when I called very recently (September I believe) I am not trying to challenge your word with these emails just trying to find out how to Prove with hard evidence what you are saying before I go back to court. Another point is that you say you can win if Federal Court but if you bring a frivolous case to federal court you go to jail. The State court saw it as frivolous. I tried looking up these type of court cases in Federal court which is in Downtown Norfolk and have found NOTHING published...... from the state of Virginia location.... Sorry once bitten twice shy in this court business.... Richard Cornforth says you have to bring a Rico Case against them. Bud
Hibbs says go to a Consumer Lawyer with the judgement I am not sure at theis point what to do.


--- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com>
> Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 8:00 PM
> Pam Davis, eh? Well who was the notary then? Who notarized
> that
> affidavit? So what name did they answer the phone by when
> you called
> them? Who is this supposed subsidiary of the CC company?
>
> So the judge don't like Pro Se litigants, eh? Well
> nothing unusual
> about that. It is very difficult for pro se litigants to
> win in local
> court but pretty easy for them to win in federal court.
>
>
>
> On Oct 12, 5:36 pm, Lisa Angle
> <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies
> of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now
> really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for
> subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly
> where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections
> stating  the copies were from CC company and she was
> notorizing it to that fact.  The notary stamp was from
> Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research
> called the company she worked for and found that she was
> there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company....
>  The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector
> etc etc etc.  It is on all correspondance.  They did send
> the first letter and I did ask for verification and they
> sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court.
>  When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a
> General District court quoting case study and you cannot
> when at that level on case study.  They only had an oral
> >  contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but
> the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in
> jail...  He did not like pro se litigation and definately
> has a relationship with the attornies that go in there..
>  You truly do not get a fair trial in this state....  Bud
> Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work
> for the naca I think.....  Claim they are familiar with the
> FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for
> why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a
> retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with
> stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.  
> >
> > --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench
> <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt
> Collection Discovery Requests
> > > To: "Creditwrench"
> <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > > The affidavit should be more than enough to get
> the job done
> > > if it
> > > contains any false and misleading information
> which most of
> > > them do.
> > > The first thing to look at in analyzing
> affidavits is to
> > > look at the
> > > notary and the seal to see what state the notary
> is located
> > > in. If the
> > > notary is not from your home state then it was
> probably
> > > generated by
> > > the debt collector. So who is the notary in your
> case, what
> > > state is
> > > the notary from and who is the affiant? So they
> never sent
> > > you any
> > > letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on
> you, eh? That
> > > may be
> > > another violation if they did not have the full
> miranda
> > > warning on the
> > > complaint. If the full miranda was not on the
> complaint
> > > anywhere did
> > > they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of
> the
> > > service of the
> > > summons upon you? If not then you have another
> violation.
> > > There are
> > > many more ways to get violations.
> >
> > > You guess you need to find a consumer attorney?
> Where are
> > > you going to
> > > find a good one that knows what he is doing?
> There
> > > aren't many of
> > > those out there so if you want to get the job
> done you have
> > > to learn
> > > how to do it yourself and that is what I teach.
> And why do
> > > you want to
> > > waste time going to the law library to look up
> the FDCPA
> > > when it is
> > > readily available on the web?
> >
> > > On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> > > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > ok well these attorney's never called me
> not even
> > > once only sent letters.  They brought a witness
> to court
> > > and an affidavit so they never testified as
> attornies are
> > > not allowed to testify in a court for the cc
> company.  No I
> > > cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> > > circumstances but I guess next step is to try a
> consumer
> > > attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I
> will try to
> > > go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see
> if I can
> > > find anything.....    
> >
> >
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

Pam Davis, eh? Well who was the notary then? Who notarized that
affidavit? So what name did they answer the phone by when you called
them? Who is this supposed subsidiary of the CC company?

So the judge don't like Pro Se litigants, eh? Well nothing unusual
about that. It is very difficult for pro se litigants to win in local
court but pretty easy for them to win in federal court.

On Oct 12, 5:36 pm, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections stating  the copies were from CC company and she was notorizing it to that fact.  The notary stamp was from Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research called the company she worked for and found that she was there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company....  The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector etc etc etc.  It is on all correspondance.  They did send the first letter and I did ask for verification and they sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court.  When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a General District court quoting case study and you cannot when at that level on case study.  They only had an oral
>  contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in jail...  He did not like pro se litigation and definately has a relationship with the attornies that go in there..  You truly do not get a fair trial in this state....  Bud Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work for the naca I think.....  Claim they are familiar with the FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.  
>
> --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Creditwrench <creditwre...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> > To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> > Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> > The affidavit should be more than enough to get the job done
> > if it
> > contains any false and misleading information which most of
> > them do.
> > The first thing to look at in analyzing affidavits is to
> > look at the
> > notary and the seal to see what state the notary is located
> > in. If the
> > notary is not from your home state then it was probably
> > generated by
> > the debt collector. So who is the notary in your case, what
> > state is
> > the notary from and who is the affiant? So they never sent
> > you any
> > letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on you, eh? That
> > may be
> > another violation if they did not have the full miranda
> > warning on the
> > complaint. If the full miranda was not on the complaint
> > anywhere did
> > they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of the
> > service of the
> > summons upon you? If not then you have another violation.
> > There are
> > many more ways to get violations.
>
> > You guess you need to find a consumer attorney? Where are
> > you going to
> > find a good one that knows what he is doing? There
> > aren't many of
> > those out there so if you want to get the job done you have
> > to learn
> > how to do it yourself and that is what I teach. And why do
> > you want to
> > waste time going to the law library to look up the FDCPA
> > when it is
> > readily available on the web?
>
> > On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> > <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > ok well these attorney's never called me not even
> > once only sent letters.  They brought a witness to court
> > and an affidavit so they never testified as attornies are
> > not allowed to testify in a court for the cc company.  No I
> > cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> > circumstances but I guess next step is to try a consumer
> > attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I will try to
> > go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see if I can
> > find anything.....    
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

one they sent valadation supposedly the photo copies of the credit card slips which I know was not legal now really then the affidavit from one Pam Davis who Works for subsidary of the credit card company which is supposedly where the Credit Card company sends there debt collections stating the copies were from CC company and she was notorizing it to that fact. The notary stamp was from Missouri and so was Ms. Davis I tried to do my research called the company she worked for and found that she was there. It was a subsidiary of the Credit Card company.... The Miranda you mean that this is from a debt collector etc etc etc. It is on all correspondance. They did send the first letter and I did ask for verification and they sent the affidavit and the slips then filed it in the court. When I went to court my biggest mistake was I went into a General District court quoting case study and you cannot when at that level on case study. They only had an oral
contract with me and I thought I had it nailed but the judge through the book at me and threatened to put me in jail... He did not like pro se litigation and definately has a relationship with the attornies that go in there.. You truly do not get a fair trial in this state.... Bud Hibbs gave me the tip on the consumer lawyer and they work for the naca I think..... Claim they are familiar with the FDCPA and The truth in lending act and on and on.....As for why go to the law library my answer to that is I have a retired lawyer librarian friend there who helps me with stuff and looks at papers and talks to me that is why.


--- On Sun, 10/12/08, Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Creditwrench <creditwrench@gmail.com>
> Subject: [creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests
> To: "Creditwrench" <creditwrench@googlegroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 5:20 PM
> The affidavit should be more than enough to get the job done
> if it
> contains any false and misleading information which most of
> them do.
> The first thing to look at in analyzing affidavits is to
> look at the
> notary and the seal to see what state the notary is located
> in. If the
> notary is not from your home state then it was probably
> generated by
> the debt collector. So who is the notary in your case, what
> state is
> the notary from and who is the affiant? So they never sent
> you any
> letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on you, eh? That
> may be
> another violation if they did not have the full miranda
> warning on the
> complaint. If the full miranda was not on the complaint
> anywhere did
> they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of the
> service of the
> summons upon you? If not then you have another violation.
> There are
> many more ways to get violations.
>
> You guess you need to find a consumer attorney? Where are
> you going to
> find a good one that knows what he is doing? There
> aren't many of
> those out there so if you want to get the job done you have
> to learn
> how to do it yourself and that is what I teach. And why do
> you want to
> waste time going to the law library to look up the FDCPA
> when it is
> readily available on the web?
>
>
> On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle
> <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > ok well these attorney's never called me not even
> once only sent letters.  They brought a witness to court
> and an affidavit so they never testified as attornies are
> not allowed to testify in a court for the cc company.  No I
> cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these
> circumstances but I guess next step is to try a consumer
> attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I will try to
> go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see if I can
> find anything.....    
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[creditwrench newsletter] Re: Debt Collection Discovery Requests

The affidavit should be more than enough to get the job done if it
contains any false and misleading information which most of them do.
The first thing to look at in analyzing affidavits is to look at the
notary and the seal to see what state the notary is located in. If the
notary is not from your home state then it was probably generated by
the debt collector. So who is the notary in your case, what state is
the notary from and who is the affiant? So they never sent you any
letters, but rather just filed the lawsuit on you, eh? That may be
another violation if they did not have the full miranda warning on the
complaint. If the full miranda was not on the complaint anywhere did
they have a letter in your hands within 5 days of the service of the
summons upon you? If not then you have another violation. There are
many more ways to get violations.

You guess you need to find a consumer attorney? Where are you going to
find a good one that knows what he is doing? There aren't many of
those out there so if you want to get the job done you have to learn
how to do it yourself and that is what I teach. And why do you want to
waste time going to the law library to look up the FDCPA when it is
readily available on the web?


On Oct 12, 9:40 am, Lisa Angle <lisaangle0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ok well these attorney's never called me not even once only sent letters.  They brought a witness to court and an affidavit so they never testified as attornies are not allowed to testify in a court for the cc company.  No I cant figure out how to use the FDCPA under these circumstances but I guess next step is to try a consumer attorney who is specialized in the FDCPA....  I will try to go by the law library and read the FDCPA to see if I can find anything.....    

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Creditwrench" group.
To post to this group, send email to creditwrench@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to creditwrench+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/creditwrench?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---